Rabbit писал(а):матчасть, это общеизвестные факты
общеизвестные факты?
вот они тоже
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... Bm-dRdT_vM
а по сути. Можно долго гонять теорию.
Технологии не стоят на месте.
51 дюйм плазма
Averaged power consumption in calibrated 2D mode was a reasonably respectable 270W – compared to 295W in, out of the box, Standard mode, so perhaps a good excuse to get a professional calibration approved by the other half. As expected 3D processing was a little more power hungry in consuming an averaged 332W
55 дюйм лед
As far as energy consumption is concerned the 55LW980 is incredibly efficient for a screen of this size. Obviously, due to the nature of the technology, LCD uses less energy than plasma and LED backlighting is more efficient than CCFL so we wold expect the numbers to be good. However an average measurement of 100W in calibrated mode is excellent for a 55" screen. When we went into 3D mode the brightness increased which pushed the energy consumption up but even then it only averaged 140W, which is still very good. Certainly if you're looking for a big screen TV without a big carbon footprint, then the 55LW980 could be the one for you.
даже если считаем что в три раза.
100 ватт к 270 это 2.7
а цена?
LG 55LW980T
1080p LCD 3D TV with Full LED Backlight
Size: 55 inch television
Suggested price:
£2,499
Full HD 3D Plasma TV
Size: 51 inch television
Suggested price:
£1,000
и того.. во сколько выигрываем в цене, во столько "проигрываем" в энергопотреблении. Но картинка то на плазме намного красивее.
А посчитать... сколько на 1.5 к фунтов разницы можно ляхтрычества купить? Да он считай бесплатно будет работать 10 лет пока вы будете мастурбировать на низкое потребление дорогущего леда..
Добавлено спустя 1 минуту 10 секунд:
Samsung PS51D550
Full HD 3D Plasma TV
Size: 51 inch television
Suggested price: £1,000 второй телик, неполностью скопепастил
Кст, по опыту, чтобы не купил, все равно довольным будешь. Это главный критерий.
